Cllr Healy Raises Concerns Over Controversial Plans For Phone Mast

Cllr Healy Raises Concerns Over Controversial Plans For Phone Mast
Cllr Healy Raises Concerns Over Controversial Plans For Phone Mast

Proposals to site a permanent 70ft high telephone mast next to residential houses in the car park of the new , are facing strong resistance from local residents.

Councillor has now stepped in so their voices can be heard after the controversial plans were submitted on behalf of two mobile phone operators.

In a statement released, Cllr Healy said;

“Before the original 1960s bedroom block of the Beverley Arms was demolished a few months ago, it had various pieces of telecommunications equipment on the roof, which are essential for mobile phone coverage in Beverley.”

“That equipment was temporarily re-sited on a mast in the unused car park whilst demolition and reconstruction work took place, and the Council gave permission for this to happen under emergency planning powers.”

“Although the temporary mast is intrusive and unsightly, local residents had assumed that once the new hotel was complete, the equipment would be put back on the roof of the new building, and simply accepted the temporary mast as part of the disruption necessary whilst the new hotel is constructed.”

“Indeed, my understanding from residents is that the mobile phone operators had given an undertaking to our local MP that the equipment would be put back on the roof once the new hotel was complete.”

“However, just before , a notice appeared on a lamp post, informing residents of the planning application for a new mast, which is to be situated away from the hotel itself, at the edge of the car park and next to residents’ gardens.”

“To make matters worse, the Council has given an extremely short period of time for residents to comment, setting a deadline of 9 January, when the notice itself appeared only a few days before Christmas.”

“With the Christmas and New Year holiday falling in the middle of what was already a very sort consultation period, it almost feels as if the applicant and officers were hoping that no-one would notice, and that the deadline would pass before people had a chance to air their views.”

“I am a strong supporter of Thwaites and the new Beverley Arms Hotel development, and everybody accepts that mobile phone transmitters have to be sited somewhere, but the original intention was to re-site on the roof, and if this isn’t now possible, we should be considering other options that reduce the visual impact to our residents.”

“I want to see less haste and more consultation with this application, including giving the local people who will be affected, the opportunity to comment and come up with suggestions.”

“With this in mind I will be asking the Council to extend the neighbours’ consultation period, and I will be calling this application to the Eastern area planning committee in the interests of a full and proper debate.”

“Residents need to have their voices heard, and it’s my job as their Councillor to ensure that this happens.”



More From HU17.net

This article has 2 Comments

  1. As a local resident I am entirely behind Councillor Healy’s stance on this. The developers have introduced this plan with incredibly short notice over the Christmas period when I can only presume they hope it will slip through unnoticed. The conservation officer is in favour of the plan because ‘it would have less of an impact on the character and appearance of the area because if moves the structure away from the hotel’ It achieves that by moving it into the heart of a residential area, where it will have the same detrimental impact.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *